Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Sanjari v. State

September 21, 2009

AMIR SANJARI, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL., RESPONDENT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

By order filed July 7, 2009, petitioner's amended application, which had superseded the original petition, was dismissed and thirty days' leave to amend was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not filed an amended application or otherwise responded to the court's order. Petitioner consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned on June 24, 2009.

Although it appears from the file that petitioner's copy of the order was returned, petitioner was properly served. It is the petitioner's responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

20090921

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.