IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 21, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
LAN TUYET NGUYEN, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Anthony W. Ishii Chief United States District Judge
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND RESET MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ORDER THEREON
Date: November 23, 2009
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, DAVID L. GAPPA, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for Plaintiff, and DOUGLAS J. BEEVERS, Assistant Federal Defender, counsel for defendant LAN TUYET NGUYEN, that the status date for status conference in this matter may be continued to November 23, 2009. It is also requested that a new motion briefing schedule be ordered. It is requested that defense motion deadline be extended from September 28, 2009; that any response or opposition may be filed by October 30, 2009; and that the hearing on the motions may be set for November 23, 2009. The date currently set for status conference is September 21, 2009. The requested new date is November 23, 2009.
This continuance is requested by defense counsel because new case law regarding search warrants was published in August, 2009, that could affect this case. The requested continuance will conserve time and resources for both counsel and the court.
The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded as necessary for effective defense preparation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), and for the filing of pretrial motions and ruling thereon pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(1)(F).
LAWRENCE G. BROWN United States Attorney DATED: September 18, 2009 DAVID L. GAPPA Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender
DATED: September 18, 2009 DOUGLAS J. BEEVERS Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant LAN TUYET NGUYEN
ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED.
The intervening period of delay is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(1)(F) and 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.