Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ingram v. Miller

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 21, 2009

CHADERICK INGRAM, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ANDREW MILLER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a motion for summary judgment. The motion does not comply with Local Rule 56-260(a) and will therefore be denied without prejudice.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (docket no. 28) is denied without prejudice.

20090921

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.