IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 24, 2009
IVAN KILGORE, PLAINTIFF,
RICHARD MANDEVILLE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge
On August 31, 2009, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed August 20, 2009, denying plaintiff's motion for a court order requiring a third party to answer written deposition questions. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's August 31, 2009 motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 50) is denied; and
2. The order of the magistrate judge filed August 20, 2009 is affirmed.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.