Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Real Property Located in Orange

September 25, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN ORANGE, CALIFORNIA, DEFENDANT. ELIZABETH LARA, CLAIMANT. AND CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Florence-marie Cooper United States District Judge

[AND THE FOLLOWING CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS: United States v. $15,781.76 in U.S. Currency, et al., CV 07-1962-FMC (PLAx); and United States v. Real Property Located in Orange, California, CV 06-6759-FMC (PLAx)]

CONSENT JUDGMENT

[NOTICE OF LODGING LODGED CONCURRENTLY HEREWITH] [THIS DOCUMENT PERTAINS TO United States v. $15,781.76 in U.S. Currency, et al., 2:07-cv-01962-FMC-PLAx, ONLY]

On March 26, 2007, plaintiff United States of America ("plaintiff" or the "government") filed a Complaint for Forfeiture against the defendant properties as follows: $15,781.76 in US Currency (the "defendant currency"); one 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe (the "2002 Chevrolet"); one 2003 Chevrolet Impala (the "2003 Chevrolet"); and one 1998 Chevrolet Tahoe (the "1998 Chevrolet")(collectively the "defendant properties"). The government alleged that the defendant properties were subject to forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(4) and (6).

Claimants Maricela Cortez, Mario Cortez Orozco, and Elizabeth Lara (collectively "claimants") filed Statements of Interest. Claimants Maricela Cortez and Mario Cortez Orozco filed their Statements of Interest on April 30, 2007. Likewise, claimant Elizabeth Lara filed her Statement of Interest on May 10, 2007. No other claims, statements of interest, or answers have been filed, and the time for filing claims, statements, and answers has expired.

The government and claimants have agreed to settle this forfeiture action and to avoid further litigation.

The Court having been duly advised of and having considered the matter, and based upon the consent of plaintiff and claimants,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:

1. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1345 and 1355.

2. The Complaint for Forfeiture states a claim for relief pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(4) and (6).

3. Notice of this action has been given as required by law. Claimants filed the only statements of interest or claims. Claimants are relieved of their duty to file answers in this action. The Court deems that all other potential claimants admit the allegations of the Complaint for Forfeiture to be true.

4. Claimants agree to forfeiture as set out below. A judgment of forfeiture is hereby entered in favor of the United States, which shall dispose of the following defendant properties in accordance with the law:

(A) The United States of America shall have judgment as to $5,781.76 of the defendant currency, plus all interest earned by the government on the entirety of the defendant currency, and no other person or entity shall have any right, title or interest therein. The United States Marshals Service is ordered to dispose of the said currency in accordance with law.

(B) $10,000.00 of the defendant currency, without any interest earned by the government on that amount, shall be returned to claimants Mario Cortez Orozco and Maricela Cortez. Said currency shall be forwarded by check made payable to "David M. Nisson, Esq., Attorney-Client Trust Account," and shall be mailed to David M. Nisson, Esq. at the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.