Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
United States v. Bailes
September 27, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
GEORGE HAMILTON BAILES, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING DATE, CONTINUING CASE AND EXCLUDING TIME
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Kenneth J. Melikian, Counsel for Plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Jeffrey L. Staniels, Counsel for Defendant, that the date for sentencing scheduled for September 28, 2009, be vacated and the case continued until November 23, 2009, at 8:30 a.m. for further status conference.
The reason for this continuance is to allow counsel to consult with Mr. Bailes concerning objections to the recommended amount of restitution. Discussions had started on this matter, but were inadvertently side-tracked. At present the presentence report reflects claims for consequential damages and for an episode in which Mr. Bailes did not cause any loss.
Dated: September 24, 2009
MICHAEL BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney Counsel for Plaintiff
Dated: September 24, 2009
JEFFREY L. STANIELS Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant GEORGE HAMILTON BAILES
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...