Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Bailes

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 27, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
GEORGE HAMILTON BAILES, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING DATE, CONTINUING CASE AND EXCLUDING TIME

Date: September 28, 2009

Time: 8:30 a.m.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Kenneth J. Melikian, Counsel for Plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Jeffrey L. Staniels, Counsel for Defendant, that the date for sentencing scheduled for September 28, 2009, be vacated and the case continued until November 23, 2009, at 8:30 a.m. for further status conference.

The reason for this continuance is to allow counsel to consult with Mr. Bailes concerning objections to the recommended amount of restitution. Discussions had started on this matter, but were inadvertently side-tracked. At present the presentence report reflects claims for consequential damages and for an episode in which Mr. Bailes did not cause any loss.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: September 24, 2009

MICHAEL BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney Counsel for Plaintiff

Dated: September 24, 2009

JEFFREY L. STANIELS Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant GEORGE HAMILTON BAILES

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090927

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.