Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Garcia v. Roosters Burger and Grill

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 30, 2009

SALOMON GARCIA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROOSTERS BURGER AND GRILL, LLC, RAY ESCALANTE, AND ESTHER ESCALANTE, DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

On September 14, 2009, defendants Ray and Esther Escalante filed a pro se motion for extension of time to respond to plaintiff's complaint. Defendant Roosters Burger and Grill had not made a proper appearance. In accordance with Local Rule 72-302(c)(21), the case was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge. Three days later, an answer to the complaint was filed by counsel representing all three defendants. The case will now be referred back to the assigned district judge for further proceedings, as provided in the local rule.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21), this action is referred back to the assigned district judge for further proceedings, and the docket shall be modified to reflect that this case is not a Pro Se case; and

2. All documents hereafter submitted for filing in the case shall bear case number Civ. S-09-2305 FCD DAD or 2:09-cv-2305 FCD DAD.

20090930

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.