Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Mastodon Investments v. CIT Business Lending
October 1, 2009
MASTODON INVESTMENTS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CIT BUSINESS LENDING, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Plaintiffs have filed a motion to compel. The motion was not properly noticed for hearing. Moreover, the joint discovery statement, required under Local Rule 37-251, was not filed. The parties are reminded that under this rule, the parties must meet and confer regarding discovery disputes.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to compel (docket no. 43) is denied.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...