Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ingram v. Sacramento Police Dep't

October 2, 2009

CHADERICK A. INGRAM, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, K-9 UNIT, OFFICER G. DAHL #672, DOES 1 TO 50; DEFENDANTS.



ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

On August 28, 2009, plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. Dckt. No. 47. In light of the district judge's September 30, 2009 order adopting the September 4, 2009 findings and recommendations in full, the motion is denied as moot.*fn1 Dckt. Nos. 48, 51.

IT IS SO ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.