IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
October 5, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
GALE JOSEPH YOUNG DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge
PLAINTIFF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARING
HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY
A hearing on defendant's motion regarding the admissibility of DNA evidence is currently set for October 7, 2009. However, the government was unable to file its expert declaration by the due date of September 14, 2009. When defense counsel received the government's declaration on September 23, 2009, the defendant's expert was on vacation. Mr. Young acknowledges the need for additional time to file a responsive declaration and agrees to the exclusion of time for this purpose. Accordingly, the parties stipulate and jointly request that the deadline for defendant to file a responsive declaration be continued to October 7, 2009 and the hearing on the motion be continued to October 21, 2009, at 2:30 p.m.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
JOSEPH RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney
DATED: /s/ WILLIAM FRENTZEN Assistant United States Attorney
DATED: /s/ ELLEN LEONIDA Law Offices of Elizabeth Grossman Attorney for Gale Joseph Young
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.