Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Blackman v. Blease

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 15, 2009

TONY BLACKMAN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
COLEMAN BLEASE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action challenging the conditions of his confinement.

Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation at Corcoran State Prison, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against correctional officials employed by the CDCR at Corcoran State Prison. Plaintiff's complaint sets forth allegations that defendants have confiscated his written inmate appeals.

The Prison Litigation Reform Act provides that "[i]n no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action... under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more occasions, while incarcerated or detained in a facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the ground that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious injury." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

This plaintiff has, on 3 prior occasions, brought civil actions challenging the conditions of his confinement. All three action were dismissed as frivolous, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Blackman v. Harwell, et al., 99-5822 REC HGB P (E. Dist. Cal.); Blackman v. Medina, 05-CV-05390-SI (N. Dist. Cal.); Blackman v. Variz, 06-CV 06398 SI (N. Dist. Cal.). Plaintiff is therefore not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis unless he alleges facts indicating that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. There are no such facts alleged in the January 25, 2008, first amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff is directed to show cause, within thirty days of the date of service of this order, why his request to proceed in forma pauperis should not be revoked. Failure to file a response will result in a recommendation that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20091015

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.