Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Neal v. Campbell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 19, 2009

SEAN BAPTISTE NEAL, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROSEANNE CAMPBELL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a supplement to his complaint. However, Local Rule 15-220 requires that complaints be complete in themselves without reference to any prior pleading. This is because, as a general rule, an amended complaint supersedes a previous complaint. See Loux v. Rhay, 375 F.2d 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967). Therefore, plaintiff's October 6, 2009 supplement to his complaint shall be placed in the court's file and disregarded.*fn1


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.