Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Ross

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 29, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOHNNIE EARL ROSS, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE Date: November 20, 2009 Time: 9:00 a.m.

It is hereby stipulated between the parties, Todd Leras, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for plaintiff, and Douglas Beevers, Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for defendant JOHNNIE EARL ROSS, that the Status Conference hearing date of October 30, 2009, be vacated and a new Status Conference hearing date of November 20, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. be set.

This continuance is requested because the United States has proposed a new plea agreement which defense counsel needs reasonable time to review the plea with the defendant. Since the defendant is held in Butte County Jail, defendant will need additional time for communications with counsel. Assistant United States Attorney Todd Leras has no objection to the continuance to November 20, 2009.

In order to afford time to complete this task and to assure continuity of defense counsel, the parties agree that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of this order through November 20, 2009, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv)(Local Code T4).

Dated: October 28, 2009 LAWRENCE G. BROWN United States Attorney TODD LERAS Assistant U.S. Attorney per telephonic authorization

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the status conference presently set for October 30, 2009, be continued to November 20, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. Based on the representation of defense counsel and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defendant reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that time from the date of this Order, to and including, the November 20, 2009 status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, to allow defense counsel time to prepare.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

20091029

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.