Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Berry v. City of Fairfield

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 30, 2009

RODNEY BERRY, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CITY OF FAIRFIELD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiffs Rodney and Ethan Berry, proceeding pro se, have requested that this action be dismissed. Defendants object to the request because it was not signed by plaintiff Ethan Berry. They also object to a dismissal without prejudice.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs shall either file a dismissal with prejudice signed by both plaintiffs, or file an opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss by November 5, 2009.*fn1 Defendants may file a reply by Monday, November 9, 2009.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.