Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Fort Independence Indian Community v. State

November 9, 2009

FORT INDEPENDENCE INDIAN COMMUNITY, A FEDERALLY-RECOGNIZED TRIBE, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEFENDANTS.



ORDER

On October 30, 2009, Jack Duran and Robert A. Rosette of the law firm Rosette & Associates, PC, filed an application for substitution of counsel on behalf of the Fort Independence Indian Community ("Plaintiff") in the above-captioned matter. The application asks the Court to name Mr. Duran and Mr. Rosette as Plaintiff's counsel of record in this matter while removing Plaintiff's prior counsel, John M. Peebles and the firm of Fredericks, Peebles & Morgan, LLP. Israel Naylor, Chairman for Plaintiff, assented to the application on the basis that Plaintiff retained Rosette & Associates, PC as its general counsel in connection with this matter on October 16, 2009, and correspondingly terminated its relationship with Fredericks, Peebles & Morgan, LLP. In light of this information, this Court hereby grants the application.

IT IS SO ORDERED

20091109

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.