UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -SACRAMENTO DIVISION
November 9, 2009
B&H MANUFACTURING CO., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS AS "B&H LABELING SYSTEMS," PLAINTIFF AND COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT,
SIDEL, S.A.S., A FRENCH CORPORATION; SIDEL S.P.A. , AN ITALIAN CORPORATION; SIDEL CANADA, INC., A CANADIAN CORPORATION; SIDEL, INC., A GEORGIA CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS AND COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFFS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, JR United States District Judge
Judge: Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL REPLY PAPERS IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENTS 5,091,040 AND 5,478,422 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. Date: November 12, 2009 and Time: 10:30 a.m. Dept.: Courtroom 7
Pursuant to Paragraph 17 of the Stipulated Protective Order for the Protection of Confidential Information, issued by this Court on September 26, 2008, Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and General Local Rule 39-141, IT HEREBY IS ORDERED that
(1) Defendants' Reply To B&H Manufacturing Company, Inc.'s Response To Defendants' Statement Of Undisputed Facts In Support Of Motion For Summary Judgment Of Non-Infringement Of U.S. Patent 5,091,040,
(2) Defendants' Reply Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of Motion For Summary Judgment Of Non-Infringement Of U.S. Patent 5,478,422,
(3) Defendants' Reply To B&H Manufacturing Company, Inc.'s Response To Defendants' Statement Of Undisputed Facts In Support Of Motion For Summary Judgment Of Non-Infringement Of U.S. Patent 5,478,422, (4) Defendants' Response To B&H Manufacturing Company, Inc.'s Statement Of Disputed Facts In Opposition To Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment Of NonInfringement Of U.S. Patent 5,478,422 and
(5) Supplemental Declaration Of Antonio Secchi In Support Of Defendant Sidel S.p.A.'s Motions For Summary Judgment Of Non-Infringement Of U.S. Patents 5,091,040 And 5,478,422 all be filed under seal, for good cause shown.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.