IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 10, 2009
EULA LEE M. JACKSON, PLAINTIFF,
INVESTMENT COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, DEFENDANT.
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a request to reopen the above-entitled action, which was closed on May 7, 2004. The request was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge by minute order filed October 1, 2009.
On October 5, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. In the interests of justice, plaintiff's letter filed October 22, 2009 will be construed as objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 5, 2009 (Doc. No. 11) are adopted in full; and
2. Plaintiff's August 5, 2009 request to reopen this case (Doc. No. 9) is denied.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.