Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jackson v. Investment County of Sacramento

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 10, 2009

EULA LEE M. JACKSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
INVESTMENT COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, DEFENDANT.

ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a request to reopen the above-entitled action, which was closed on May 7, 2004. The request was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge by minute order filed October 1, 2009.

On October 5, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. In the interests of justice, plaintiff's letter filed October 22, 2009 will be construed as objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 5, 2009 (Doc. No. 11) are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's August 5, 2009 request to reopen this case (Doc. No. 9) is denied.

20091110

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.