Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Pearson v. Stryker Corp.

November 12, 2009

LAWRENCE PEARSON, ET AL PLAINTIFF(S),
v.
STRYKER CORPORATION, ET AL DEFENDANT(S).



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable James Ware United States District Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

✔9 Private ADR ( please identify process and provider )

Mediation

Kyle Schultz, 10th Circuit Mediator

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.