Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
United States v. Rodriguez-Castellanos
November 13, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROGELIO RODRIGUEZ-CASTELLANOS, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Michael D. Anderson, Counsel for Plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Jeffrey L. Staniels, Counsel for Defendant, that the Admit/Deny Hearing scheduled for November 16, 2009, be vacated and the case continued until January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. for further status conference. This continuance is sought in light of counsel's recent work schedule, the availability of defense counsel's interpreter, and to permit review and consultation regarding an offer to resolve the case without hearing.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that provisions of the Speedy Trial Act are not implicated by the continuance of this case, which charges violations of a term of supervised release.
MICHAEL D. ANDERSON Assistant U.S. Attorney Counsel for Plaintiff
JEFFREY L. STANIELS Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant ROGELIO RODRIGUEZ-CASTELLANOS
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...