Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Morfin v. Accredited Home Lenders

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 17, 2009

ROBERTO MORFIN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ACCREDITED HOME LENDERS, INC.; ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: William Q. Hayes United States District Judge

ORDER

HAYES, Judge

The matter before the Court is the Notice of Bankruptcy Filing. (Doc. # 32).

Background

On April 16, 2009, Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a Complaint in this Court. (Doc. # 1). On April 16, 2009, Plaintiff filed Notice of Lis Pendens. (Doc. # 3). On August 27, 2009, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. (Doc. # 6).

On September 29, 2009, Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as an acquirer of certain assets and liabilities of Washington Mutual Bank, filed a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. (Doc. # 13).

On October 8, 2009, non-party Lendsure Investments Fund 1, LLC filed a Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens. (Doc. # 16).

On October 19, 2009, Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. # 19). On October 22, 2009, Plaintiff filed response in opposition to the Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens, and a Motion to Strike the Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens. (Doc. # 23-24).

On October 27, 2009, Defendant Franklin Credit Management Corporation filed a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. (Doc. # 27).

On November 12, 2009, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Bankruptcy Filing. (Doc. # 32). The Notice of Bankruptcy Filing notified the parties and the Court that on November 10, 2009, Plaintiff filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code with the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of California, case number 09-17310-LT7.

Ruling of the Court

Section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code operates as an automatic stay of the commencement or continuation of a judicial proceeding "against the debtor" commenced prior to the filing of bankruptcy. 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1). "The automatic stay of § 362(a) is intended to preserve the status quo and provide a debtor with a breathing spell from its creditors, while simultaneously preventing creditors from racing to various courthouses to pursue independent remedies against a debtor." In re Way, 229 B.R. 11, 13 (9th Cir. B.A.P. 1998) (citation omitted). "The primary purposes of § 362 do not apply, however, to offensive actions by a debtor or bankruptcy trustee, as the same policy considerations do not exist where the debtor has initiated a prepetition lawsuit against a creditor. Therefore, we have clearly held that the automatic stay does not prohibit a defendant in an action brought by a plaintiff/debtor from defending itself in that action." Id. (citing In re White, 186 B.R. 700, 703 (9th Cir. B.A.P. 1995); In re Merrick, 175 B.R. 333, 336 (9th Cir. B.A.P. 1994)). In Way, the defendants filed a prepetition motion to dismiss, seeking dismissal of a lawsuit filed by the debtor in state court. Following the bankruptcy filing, the state court ruled on the motion, and dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice. The Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel held that the "[defendants] did not violate the automatic stay by obtaining dismissal post-petition of a state court action initiated by the debtor prepetition." Id. at 15. The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel "recognized that § 362 does not prevent a trustee or a debtor from continuing to prosecute a debtor's pre-bankruptcy lawsuit, and determined that out of fairness a defendant should be allowed to defend himself from attack.... The automatic stay should not tie the hands of a defendant while the plaintiff debtor is given free reign to litigate." Id. at 14.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action, which was initiated by Plaintiff prepetition, is not stayed. Any opposition to the Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Franklin Credit Management Corporation (Doc. # 27), shall be filed no later than December 4, 2009. Any reply shall be filed no later than December 11, 2009. After ruling on the pending Motions to Dismiss, the Court will consider what effect, if any, Plaintiff's bankruptcy filing has upon the pending Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens. (Doc. # 16).

20091117

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.