UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 17, 2009
SKILSTAF, INC., ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF,
14CVS CAREMARK CORP.; DRUG STORE CORPORATION; THE EXTENSION KROGER CO.; NEW ALBERTSON'S, INC.; RITE AID CORPORATION; SAFEWAY, INC.; SUPERVALU, INC.; WALGREEN CO.; AND WAL-MART C OMPLAINT F ILED: JUNE 5, 2009 STORES, INC., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Susan Illston
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PAGE LIMITATION FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' CONSOLIDATED MOTION TO DISMISS AND REQUEST LONGS FOR ORDER GRANTING PAGE
to Defendants' Consolidated Motion to Dismiss and Request for Order Granting Page Extension between Plaintiff Skilstaf, Inc. and Defendants Rite Aid, Inc. ("Rite Aid"), CVS Caremark Corp.
New Albertson's, Inc. ("New Albertson's"), Safeway, Inc. ("Safeway"), Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Rite Aid "Defendants") and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Having reviewed the Joint Stipulation Regarding Page Limitation for Plaintiff's Response ("CVS Caremark"), Longs Drug Store Corporation ("Longs") Supervalu, Inc. ("SuperValu"), ("Wal-Mart"), Walgreen Co. ("Walgreens"), The Kroger Co. ("Kroger") (collectively except for
1. Plaintiff may submit a single memorandum in opposition to Defendants' Joint Responsive Pleading and Rite Aid's Motion to Dismiss not to exceed 50 pages in length, exclusive of any caption, table of contents, table of authorities, signatures and supporting documents.
2. Rite Aid shall be allowed, if it so chooses, to file its own Reply pursuant to this Court's August 6 Order Regarding Response to Complaint and Request for Order Changing
3. All other deadlines and requirements of this Court's August 6 Order Regarding Response to Complaint and Request for Order Changing Time shall remain.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November ___, 2009 20
Judge Susan Illston
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.