UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 25, 2009
HAVA ZLOTNIK AND JOHN ZLOTNIK PLAINTIFF(S),
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOC.. SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO FDICR FOR DOWNEYSAVINGS SAVINGS DEFENDANT(S).
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Phyllis J. Hamilton United States District Judge
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
[c57] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) [c57] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) [c57] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
[c57] Private ADR (please identify process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
[c57] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.
[c57] other requested deadline
March 15, 2010
Stephen P. Collette Attorney for Plaintiff
Eric M. Alderete Attorney for Defendant
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation."
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: [c57] Non-binding Arbitration [c57] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
[c57] Mediation [c57] Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session [c57] 90 days from the date of this order. [c57] other ___________________
March 15, 2009
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.