Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Myers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 1, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
RONDEL H. MYERS, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: VIRGINIA A. Phillips United States District Judge

JUDGMENT AND COMMITMENT ORDER FOLLOWING HEARING ON PETITION ALLEGING VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

On November 23, 2009, this matter came on regularly for hearing on the Amended Petition on Probation and Supervised Release filed August 10, 2009, Docket No. 25. Appearing on behalf of the Defendant was Angela Viramonte, Deputy Federal Public Defender, and appearing on behalf of the Government was Assistant United States Attorney Daniel Ackerman. Also present was Probation Officer Jesse Jacobs.

The Defendant appeared previously before the Court on October 19, 2009, in this matter and entered an admission of guilt to the Allegations of the Amended Petition, Docket No. 25.

The Court finds the Defendant in violation of the terms and conditions of Supervised Release as previously imposed in the Judgment and Probation/Commitment Order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, filed December 27, 1999.

IT IS ADJUDGED that defendant, Rondel H. Myers, is hereby committed to the Custody of the Bureau of Prisons to serve a Six-month term of imprisonment. Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed in a Community Corrections Center (CCC) located in Rubidoux, California or the facility in El Monte, California, and shall observe all rules and regulations of such facility until released by the Director of such facility and as directed by the United States Probation Officer.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no additional period of supervision is imposed. The defendant was advised of his right to file an appeal within 10 days of entry of judgment.

On motion of the Government, the Court ORDERS the dismissal of any remaining allegations.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20091201

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.