IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
December 1, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
PATRICK NEAL YOUNG, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING; [PROPOSED] ORDER Date: January 8, 2010 Time: 8:45 A.M.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the Status Conference Hearing in the above-captioned matter now set for December 4, 2009, may be continued to January 8, 2010, at 8:45 a.m.
This continuance is requested by counsel for defendant because the work that is necessary to be completed in order to finish review of the defendant's amount of expenses and to review with client has not yet been completed. The parties have previously discussed resolution of this matter short of trial. It is counsel's belief that those discussions are still viable and the parties may be able to resolve this matter, saving both parties considerable time and saving the Court's resources. The requested continuance will conserve time and resources for both counsel and the court.
The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice, including but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for further defense preparation and plea negotiations pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).
Time is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) .
The factual basis for the request is weak, if not non-existent with detail to explain why the time from the last hearing was not enough time to complete the tasks at hand. The Court will grant the continuance without the necessary detail THIS TIME.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.