Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Kyle v. Rite Aird Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 7, 2009

MARIE H. KYLE PLAINTIFF(S),
v.
RITE AIRD CORPORATION DEFENDANT(S).

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

The court has identified this action as one that appears suitable for reassignment to future proceedings pursuant to 28 USC § 636(c). Such reassignment has the potential to result in greater convenience to the parties and more expeditious disposition of the matter Magistrate Judge Nandor J Vadas, whose courtroom is located in Eureka, California, for all on the merits.

The parties are directed to confer regarding reassignment and to file, on or before December 17, 2009, a letter stating whether or not the parties consent to reassignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Vadas. If the parties so consent, the matter will be transferred. The parties will thereafter file written consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in the form requested by Magistrate Judge Vadas.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20091207

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.