Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Seefeldt v. Aramark

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 8, 2009

BRIAN SEEFELDT, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ARAMARK, INC., DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows U.S. Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has requested this action be dismissed. Defendants were directed to notify the court whether they have any objection to the dismissal of this action. Defendants have failed to respond which the court construes as defendants' acquiescence to dismissal. No responsive pleading has been filed as of yet.

Accordingly, pursuant to the self-executing provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), this action is dismissed, and the Clerk shall close the case.

20091208

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.