Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Altmann v. Indymac Federal Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 8, 2009

ERNEST ALTMANN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK; GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC; NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE A DIVISION OF NATIONAL CITY BANK; FIRST BANK DBA FIRST BANK MORTGAGE; QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP.; BANK OF AMERICA; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; REMIEN MORTGAGE FAMILY, INC.; ROBERT REMIEN; GEORGE ROJAS AND DOES 1-20, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE and FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m) NOTICE

The parties' Joint Status Report filed on December 4, 2009 reveals this case is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference ("status conference") set for December 14, 2009 is continued to February 1, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. A further joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference.*fn1

Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Rule 4(m)") that Defendants Remien Mortgage Family, Inc. and Robert Remien could be dismissed as defendants in this action under Rule 4(m) unless Plaintiff provides proof of service and/or "shows good cause for the failure" to serve these defendants within Rule 4(m)'s 120 day prescribed period, in a filing due no later than 4:00 p.m. on December 23, 2009.

Further, the Order filed in this action on August 25, 2009 required the parties to file a joint status report fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference, regardless of whether a joint status report could be procured. The parties failed to file a timely status report as ordered.

The parties are warned that failure to meet a Rule 16 filing deadline could be sanctionable conduct. Should an Order to Show Cause ("OSC") be issued in this case for such or other conduct in the future, the parties' failure to file a timely status report may also be subject of such an OSC. The parties are mistaken if they believe that filing deadlines can be ignored with impunity from being the subject of sanctioning jurisprudence.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.