Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Glenn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 10, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DARYL CURTIS GLENN, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Oliver W. Wanger United States District Judge

ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS IN LIMINE

On December 7, 2009, the following matters came on for regular hearing before this Court:

1. Plaintiff United States' Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence, Argument or Reference to Defendant's Possible Punishment (Doc. 44);

2. Plaintiff United States' Motion in Limine to Exclude Reference to Court's Rulings on Allegedly Coerced Statements of the Defendant (Doc. 45); and

3. Defendant Daryl Curtis Glenn's Motion in Limine to Exclude Post-Arrest Statements Made on January 31, 2008 (Doc. 48).

Victor M. Chavez appeared on behalf of defendant. David L. Gappa and Brian W. Enos appeared on behalf of the United States.

After considering all papers filed in connection with the above motions, as well as oral argument of the respective parties, the Court HEREBY ORDERS: (1) the United States' motion in limine to exclude evidence, argument or reference to defendant's possible punishment if convicted at trial is GRANTED;

(2) the United States' motion in limine to exclude reference to any evidence or argument that statements obtained from defendant were coerced, involuntary or obtained in violation of defendant's Constitutional rights is GRANTED; (3) defendant's motion in limine to exclude post-arrest statements made on January 31, 2008 is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20091210

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.