UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
December 14, 2009
IN RE THE PMI GROUP, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ALL ACTIONS ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING MATTERS
Violation Of The Federal Securities Laws ("First Amended Complaint"); Bradley M. Shuster, David H. Katkov and Donald P. Lofe, Jr. (collectively, "Defendants") filed a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint;
Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint and set a Case Management Conference for
WHEREAS, on November 16, 2009, pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the Court entered an order extending Defendants' time to file their Answer to the First Amended Complaint to
WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred, and due to scheduling conflicts of Defendants' counsel, agree that a brief continuance of the Case Management Conference is necessary and that additional time is necessary for Defendants to respond to the First Amended
WHEREAS, a continuance of the Case Management Conference and an extension of time for Defendants to file their Answer to the First Amended Complaint will not otherwise affect the schedule for the case, including discovery;
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure no later than December 21, 2009; 22 2009, as if the Case Management Conference were held on that date; request that the Court enter an order, as follows: 2:30 p.m.
WHEREAS, on July 24, 2009, Lead Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint For
WHEREAS, on September 2, 2009, defendants The PMI Group, Inc., L. Stephen Smith,
WHEREAS, on November 2, 2009, the Court entered an Order Denying Defendants' December 16, 2009, at 2:30 p.m.;
December 21, 2009;
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to exchange their initial disclosures pursuant to
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that discovery may commence on December 16,
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate and agree, and respectfully
1. The Case Management Conference shall be continued to February 19, 2010, at
2. Defendants shall file their Answer to the First Amended Complaint on or before January 21, 2010.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Dated: December 9, 2009 Meredith N. Landy Attorneys for Defendants The PMI Group, Inc., L. Stephen Smith, Bradley M. Shuster, David H. Katkov and Donald P. Lofe, Jr. COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP
Dated: December 9, 2009 Jeffrey W. Lawrence Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Trust, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
I, Meredith N. Landy, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Case Management Conference and Extending Time to File Answer to First Amended Complaint. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Jeffrey W. Lawrence has concurred in this filing.
Meredith N. Landy
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.