UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
December 14, 2009
LATWAHN MCELROY, PLAINTIFF,
VASQUEZ, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
On May 8, 2009, Defendants Stailey*fn1 and Cope filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (Doc. 33.) Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 78-230(m).
Accordingly, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff must file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, this action will be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to obey the Court's order and failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.