Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Rodriguez-Saucedo

December 15, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DANIEL RODRIGUEZ-SAUCEDO, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller United States District Judge

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT

Defendant Daniel Rodriguez-Saucedo moves to dismiss the indictment on the ground of a defective prior deportation proceeding. The Government opposes the motion. Having carefully considered the moving papers, the court's record, appropriate authorities, and the arguments of counsel, the court denies the motion to dismiss the indictment.

BACKGROUND

The Instant Offense

On September 13, 2008 Defendant sought entry into the United States, claiming that he was a United States citizen who was born in Los Angeles, California. Defendant did not have any documents to support his claim. A records check revealed an extensive criminal and immigration history. The next morning, at 11:32 a.m. Defendant was provided with the Miranda advisements and allegedly waived those rights. Defendant stated that he was born in Mexico, he admitted to prior deportations, and represented that he had no legal authority to enter the United States.

Immigration and Criminal History

Defendant originally entered the United States on an immigration visa on March 19, 1963. On January 28, 1976 Defendant plead guilty to first degree burglary in violation of Penal Code §459. As Defendant was originally charged with burglary, assault to commit rape, and attempted rape in violation of Penal Code §§459, 220, 664/261, on March 30, 1976 the court found Defendant a mentally disordered sex offender and recommitted him to the Department of Mental Health. On March 16, 1978 Defendant was convicted of escape from a state hospital in violation of Welfare and Institutions Code §6330 and sentenced to two years imprisonment.

As the result of a conviction for being under the influence in violation of Health and Safety Code §11550, Defendant was placed in removal proceedings. On August 4, 1989 Defendant was granted §212(c) relief from deportation.

On October 27, 1989 Defendant pleaded guilty to corporal injury of a spouse, cohabitant, or mother of child in violation of Penal Code §273.5. Defendant was once again placed in removal proceedings and, on September 23, 1993 the Immigration Judge denied a second request for §212(c) relief. On September 24, 1993 Defendant was deported from the United States.

Defendant reentered the United States and, on or about April 10, 1995, Defendant was once again placed in removal proceedings. Immigration Judge Weil rejected Defendant's argument that he was entitled to derivative citizenship because the 10/5 rule, and not the 5/2 rule (concerning residency and age) applied under the circumstances. On June 9, 1995 Defendant was ordered deported and deported on that same day.

Defendant again reentered the United States. On January 29, 1998 Defendant was convicted of assault with a deadly weapon in violation of Penal Code §245(a)(1) and sentenced to 4 years' imprisonment. Placed in removal proceedings again, on January 28, 2002 Immigration Judge Rose determined that Defendant had made no application for relief from removal, Defendant waived the right to appeal and ordered Defendant removed from the United States. Defendant was removed that same day.

Defendant again reentered the United States. On May 14, 2003 Defendant was provided with notice of the reinstatement of the order of removal from January 28, 2002. Defendant was removed that same day.

Defendant again reentered the United States. On September 19, 2003 Defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of illegal re-entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. ยง1325 in case 03cr2163 JM. As a part of the plea, he agreed to waive the right to appeal or collaterally attack the conviction and agreed to an order of removal. Defendant was sentenced to four years' imprisonment with two years supervised relief. On January 27, 2007 Defendant was again placed in removal proceedings. Defendant chose ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.