Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Maciel

December 15, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
LUIS MACIEL SOCIAL SECURITY NO. 5 3 6 1 LUIS LEONARDO MACIEL; LUIS LEONARD MACIEL (LAST 4 DIGITS)



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Percy Anderson U. S. District Judge

AMENDED

JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER

MONTH DAY YEAR

In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 08 07 06

X WITH COUNSEL Walter Urban, Retnd

(Name of Counsel)

X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea. NOLO

CONTENDERE NOT

GUILTY

There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Access device fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1029(b)(2) as charged in Count One of the Indictment.

The Court asked whether defendant had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of 24 months.

Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of three years under the following terms and conditions:

The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 318;

During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and restitution in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;

The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample;

As directed by the Probation Officer, the defendant shall apply monies received from income tax refunds, lottery winnings, inheritance, judgments, and any anticipated or unexpected financial gains to the outstanding court-ordered financial obligation;

The defendant shall not be employed in any form of employment which allows access to credit card information or personal information, including, but not limited to social security number, home address and date of birth, without prior approval from the Probation Officer. Further, the defendant shall notify each employer of the prior conviction; and

The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.

It is further ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100, which is due

Pursuant to Section 5E1.2(e) of the Guidelines, all fines are waived as it is found that the defendant does not have the ability to pay a fine in addition to restitution.

* It is ordered that the defendant shall pay restitution in the total amount of $38, 436.10, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A to victims as set forth in a separate victim list prepared by the probation office, which this Court adopts and which reflects the court's determination of the amount of restitution due to each victim. The victim list, which shall be forwarded to the fiscal section of the clerk's office, shall remain confidential to protect the privacy interests of the

Restitution shall be due during the period imprisonment, at the rate of not less than $25 per quarter, and pursuant to the Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program. If any amount of the restitution remains unpaid after release from custody, nominal monthly payments shall begin 30 days after the commencement of supervision.

It is further ordered that the defendant surrender himself to the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons on or before 12 noon, October 16, 2006. In the absence of such designation, the defendant shall report on or before the same date and time, to the United States Marshal located at:

Roybal Federal Building 255 East Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012

The defendant shall be held jointly and severally liable with co-defendant Elizabeth Vasquez, for the amount of ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.