The opinion of the court was delivered by: John F. Walter, U. S. District Judge
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in December 14 2009
x WITH COUNSEL Victor Sherman, Rtnd.
GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea. NOLO
There being a verdict of x GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Access Device Fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2) as charged in the Three-Count Indictment filed on March 20, 2009
The Court asked whether defendant had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that:
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Ravee Suphunthucat, is hereby committed on Counts One, Two and Three of the Indictment to the custody of the Bureau of 15 months. This term consists of 15 months on each of Counts One, Two and Three of the Indictment, to be served concurrently.
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of two years. This term consists of two years on each of Counts One, Two and Three of the Indictment, all such terms to run concurrently under the following terms and conditions:
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 318;
During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and restitution in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;
The defendant shall not obtain or possess any driver's license, Social Security number, birth certificate, passport or any other form of identification in any name, other than the defendant's true legal name; nor shall the defendant use, for any purpose or in any manner, any name other than his true legal name or names without the prior written approval of the Probation Officer;
The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant; and
The defendant shall apply monies in excess of $500 received from income tax refunds to the outstanding court-ordered financial obligation. In addition, the defendant shall apply all monies received from lottery winnings, inheritance, judgments and any anticipated or unexpected financial gains to the outstanding court-ordered financial obligation.
The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.
It is further ordered that the defendant surrender himself to the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons on or February 8, 2010. In the absence of such designation, the defendant shall report on or before the same date and time, to the United States Marshal located at the Roybal Federal Building, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, California 90012.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $300, which is due immediately.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay restitution in the total amount of $105,784.42, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
Restitution shall be due during the period of imprisonment, at the rate of not less than $25 per quarter, and pursuant to the Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program. If any amount of the restitution remains unpaid after release from custody, nominal monthly payments of at least $50.00 shall be made during the period of supervised release. These payments shall begin 30 days after the commencement of supervision. Nominal restitution payments are ordered as the court finds that the defendant's economic circumstances do not allow for either immediate or future payment of the amount ordered.
If the defendant makes a partial payment, each payee shall receive approximately proportional payment unless another priority order or percentage payment is specified in this judgment.
Restitution shall be paid according to the confidential victim list prepared by the probation office. The victims list, which shall be forwarded from the Probation Office to the fiscal section of the clerk's office, shall remain confidential to protect the privacy interests of the victims.
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3612(f)(3)(A), interest on the restitution ordered is waived because the defendant does not have the ability to pay interest. Payments may be subject to penalties for ...