Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hendon v. Knowles

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 15, 2009

CARLOS HENDON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
KNOWLES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On October 26, 2009 the court ordered plaintiff to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fee within 30 days and warned him that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee or otherwise responded to that order.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action.

Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

20091215

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.