Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Sultan v. Roark

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 15, 2009

MUHAMMAD SULTAN, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS,
v.
DAVID ROARK, DIRECTOR, USCIS TEXAS SERVICE CENTER, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

JOINT STIPULATION RE: SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

This is an immigration case in which plaintiff has challenged the delay in the processing of his application to adjust status to that of lawful permanent resident by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS). The parties have previously stipulated to one extension of time in which to file the government's answer. The parties endeavored to reach an administrative resolution to the matter, however, at this time, the government is preparing to file a dispositive motion and requires more time to request the supporting documentation. Accordingly, the parties stipulate to a 30-day extension of time for the government to file its answer to the complaint, until January 15, 2010.

Dated: December 10, 2009

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney By: Audrey B. Hemesath Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for the Defendants By: Robert B. Jobe Attorney for the Plaintiffs

ORDER

Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that the time for the government to answer the complaint is extended to January 15, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20091215

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.