Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Byrum v. Compass Vision

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 15, 2009

LEZLIE BYRUM, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
COMPASS VISION, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
JOANNE ELIZABETH CLEVELAND, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
COMPASS VISION, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
LORIE GARLICK, PLAINTIFF,
v.
COMPASS VISION, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
DEBORAH JEAN SMITH, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
COMPASS VISION, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
MAGDA GONZALEZ, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
COMPASS VISION, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows U. S. Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Presently before the court are motions for protective order in each of these cases. Movant State of California, Department of Consumer Affairs, has filed to properly notice the motions for hearing. Furthermore, the motions do not include copies of the subpoenas at issue.

In addition to rectifying these defects, movant will be directed on re-noticing the motions to brief the issue of why, when a state wide governmental entity is subpoenaed in connection with ongoing cases in other districts, the Eastern District should be the focal point for discovery matters in those cases.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The motions for protective order, filed December 3, 2009, are vacated. Movant shall properly notice the motions for hearing pursuant to E. D. Local Rule 251(a). The re-noticed motions shall include copies of the subpoenas at issue.

2. On refiling the motions, movant shall brief the issue described herein.

20091215

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.