Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Skilstaf, Inc. v. CVS Caremark Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 16, 2009

SKILSTAF, INC., ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CVS CAREMARK CORP.; LONGS DRUG STORE CORPORATION; THE H ONORABLE S USAN ILLSTON KROGER CO.; NEW ALBERTSON'S, INC.; RITE AID CORPORATION; COMPLAINT FILED: J UNE 5, 2009 SAFEWAY, INC.; SUPERVALU, INC.; WALGREEN CO.; AND WAL-MART STORES, INC., DEFENDANTS.

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PAGE LIMITATION FOR DEFENDANT'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF CONSOLIDATED MOTION TO DISMISS

Having reviewed the Stipulation Regarding Page Limits On Defendants' Reply In Support Of Consolidated Motion To Dismiss And Request For Order Granting Page Limit Extension between Plaintiff Skilstaf, Inc. and Defendants Rite Aid, Inc. ("Rite Aid"), CVS Caremark Corp. ("CVS Caremark"), Longs Drug Store Corporation ("Longs") Supervalu, Inc. ("SuperValu"), New Albertson's, Inc. ("New Albertson's"), Safeway, Inc. ("Safeway"), Wal- Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart"), Walgreen Co. ("Walgreens"), The Kroger Co. ("Kroger") and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ordered as follows:

1. Defendants may submit a reply memorandum in support of its Consolidated Motion to Dismiss not to exceed 25 pages in length, exclusive of any caption, table of contents, table of authorities, signatures and supporting documents.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

20091216

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.