Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rouser v. Rutherford

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 16, 2009

WILLIAM ROUSER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
K. RUTHERFORD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action. On November 20, 2009, plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the court order that tapes of a recorded conversation between himself and Suzy Watkins be played to the jury. Plaintiff argues that he is contending the transcript of the tape is not accurate.

Plaintiff's motion is premature because it is not clear whether this action will proceed to trial. If this action goes to trial, plaintiff may renew his motion if appropriate.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's November 20, 2009, motion for the tape recording to be played to the jury (no. 51) is denied without prejudice.

20091216

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.