Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Espinoza v. Sacramento County Sheriffs

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 17, 2009

EDUARDO J. ESPINOZA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFFS AND SAC. COUNTY FIRE DEPT, DEFENDANTS.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order dated November 10, 2009, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint that complies with the applicable rules and the court's order. The pro se plaintiff was granted thirty days from the date of the order to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to file a timely amended complaint will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order in any manner.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one (21) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. A document containing any objections should be titled "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

20091217

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.