Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hollis v. McGuire

December 17, 2009

MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
J. MCGUIRE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a request for reconsideration of an order issued by the court on October 9, 2009. The court may reconsider a ruling under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) or 60(b). See Sch. Dist. Number. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). "Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law." Id. at 1263.

Plaintiff does not present newly discovered evidence or demonstrate that there has been a change in controlling law. Furthermore, the court finds that, after a de novo review of this case, the court's October 9, 2009 order is neither manifestly unjust nor clearly erroneous.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's November 18, 2009 motion for reconsideration (#15) is denied.

20091217

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.