Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Zewdu v. Citigroup Long Term Disability Plan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO


December 21, 2009

HANNA ZEWDU, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITIGROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney U.S. District Court Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HEARING DATE OF PLAINTIFF'S RULE 52 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Hanna Zewdu and Defendant Citigroup Long Term Disability Plan (collectively referred to as the "Parties") through their respective counsel stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on April 10, 2009, the Court set the hearing date for the Parties's Rule 52 Motion and Cross-Motion for Judgment for March 12, 2009 (Docket Entry #18);

WHEREAS, on November 4, 2009, Plaintiff filed her Motion to Compel, which was assigned to Judge Maria-Elena James (Docket Entry #24);

WHEREAS, on November 9, 2009, Judge James denied Plaintiff's Motion to Compel without prejudice in accordance with the Court's Standing Order Re Discovery (Docket Entry #32);

WHEREAS, on December 18, 2009, the Parties filed Joint Letters to Judge James regarding the Parties's discovery dispute;

WHEREAS, the current case schedule requires Plaintiff to file her Rule 52 Motion for Judgment on January 29, 2009;

WHEREAS, the Parties do not believe that the pending discovery dispute will be resolved prior to January 29, 2009, and seek to extend certain case deadlines to permit sufficient time for the resolution of the discovery issues;

WHEREAS, the Parties have sought one extension of time in this matter regarding the ADR deadline;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES:

The case deadlines are now as follows:

Plaintiff's Rule 52 Motion for Judgment: 2/26/09

Defendant's Opposition/Cross-motion: 3/12/09

Plaintiff's Reply/Opposition: 3/26/09

Hearing: 4/9/2010

Dated: December 18, 2009

Respectfully submitted,

SPRINGER-SULLIVAN & ROBERTS LLP Michelle L. Roberts Attorney for Plaintiff

SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP Rebecca Hull Attorneys for Defendant

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The case deadlines are now as follows:

Plaintiff's Rule 52 Motion for Judgment: 2/26/09

2/26/10

Defendant's Opposition/Cross-motion: 3/12/09

3/12/10

Plaintiff's Reply/Opposition: 3/26/09

3/26/10

Hearing: 4/9/2010

Defendant's Reply: 4/9/10

Hearing: 4/30/10

20091221

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.