Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Walker v. Dyer

December 21, 2009

HAROLD WALKER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JERRY DYER, ET. AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE BY THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF COSTS

Plaintiff Harold Walker ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in the action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 23, 2009, Plaintiff informed the Court that he wished to proceed with his cognizable section 1983 claim against Defendant Officers Alvarez, Aranas, Leibee, Dozier, Corona and Robles.

On December 3, 2009, the Court ordered Plaintiff to submit USM-285 forms for service on Defendants Alvarez, Aranas, Leibee, Dozier, Corona and Robles. Although the Court referenced Defendant Dozier in the body of the order, it inadvertently omitted his name from the list of defendants to be served in the conclusion of the order. The order therefore listed five, rather than six, defendants.

On December 15, 2009, the Court issued an order directing service by the United States Marshal. This order again inadvertently omitted Defendant L. Dozier.

The Court forwarded service documents to the Marshal on December 15, 2009. The service documents forwarded are sufficient for service on six defendants.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that service is ALSO APPROPRIATE for Defendant L. Dozier, in accordance with the Court's December 15, 2009, order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20091221

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.