Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

DeFazio v. Hollister

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 21, 2009

JAMES P. DEFAZIO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HOLLISTER, INC.; ET. AL., DEFENDANTS. KATHLEEN ELLIS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HOLLISTER INCORPORATED ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
BRENDA DIMARO AND HOLLIE LAVICK, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
HOLLISTER INCORPORATED, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

[Consolidated Master Case Number]

ORDER RESETTING THE TRIAL DATE AND EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING OF VARIOUS PRETRIAL SUBMISSIONS

Judge William B. Shubb

Complaint Filed: July 15, 2004 Complaint Filed: March 22, 2005 Complaint Filed: August 25, 2005

Plaintiffs and defendants, by their respective counsel, have reported that the appeals by plaintiffs to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit have been dismissed. Accordingly, the trial of the above-captioned consolidated actions is set for October 5, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 5. The court estimates that trial will last approximately ten to fifteen days.

The parties, by their counsel, have also stipulated that the various due dates for the pretrial filings required by the Court's Final Pretrial Order shall remain intact, but will be keyed to the trial date set by this Order. Accordingly, the various pre-trial filings shall be made the number of days in advance of the trial date that are specified in the Final Pre-Trial Order.

SO ORDERED;

20091221

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.