Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mondragon v. Fernandez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 28, 2009

MONDRAGON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
JESUS FERNANDEZ, ET AL., DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Richard Seeborg United States Magistrate Judge

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL & [PROPOSED] ORDER

Parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate to continue the hearing on Plaintiffs' motion to compel as follows:

1. Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel (Docket No. 18). The hearing on the motion is currently set on January 6, 2010.

2. After Plaintiffs' motion was filed, Defendants informed Plaintiffs that the majority of documents requested were ready for inspection.

3. As such, parties stipulate to continue the hearing currently set on January 6, 2009 for three weeks to allow parties a further chance to resolve the disputes without the Court's intervention.

Dated: December 23, 2009

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel, a hearing of which is currently set for January 6, 2010. Parties stipulate to continue the hearing on the motion to allow a further chance to meet and confer to resolve the disputes among themselves.

GOOD CAUSE appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on Plaintiffs' motion to compel (Docket No. 18) be reset for January 27, 2010, at 9:30 a.m. Plaintiffs' reply, if any, should be filed no later than January 13, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20091228

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.