Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Buchanan v. Santos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 4, 2010

WHITTIER BUCHANAN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
A. SANTOS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER NOTIFYING PARTIES PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL IS NOT SET FOR A HEARING

(Docs. 29 and 30)

Plaintiff Whittier Buchanan, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a motion to compel on December 10, 2009, and indicated on the face page that the motion is set for hearing on January 26, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. Defendants reproduced that hearing date in their opposition.

Pursuant to Local Rule 78-230(l), all motions are resolved without oral argument unless otherwise ordered by the court. If the Court deems a hearing necessary after the motion has been deemed submitted, it will set a date. Absent the issuance of such an order, Plaintiff's motion will be resolved on the written record. This order serves as notice to the parties that Plaintiff's motion to compel is not set for a hearing on January 26, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. or on any other date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100104

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.