Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Cathode Ray Tube Antitrust Litigation

January 5, 2010

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION


The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Samuel Conti

MDL No. 1917

This Document Related to All Cases

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND LIMITED DISCOVERY STAY

WHEREAS the Court, on September 12, 2008, entered an Order pursuant to Stipulation, granting a Limited Stay of Discovery for six (6) months, which was to expire on March 12, 2009 ("September 12, 2008 Stay Order");

WHEREAS the Court, on February 5, 2009, entered an Order pursuant to Stipulation modifying and extending the September 12, 2008 Stay Order until September 11, 2009, with limitations on deposition discovery continuing until January 4, 2010 ("February 5, 2009 Stay Order");

WHEREAS on June 8, 2009, Special Master Charles A. Legge, entered an Order further extending the February 5, 2009 Stay Order, "until such time as the Court has issued its decision(s) on the various motions to dismiss that were filed on May 18, 2009 ("June 8, 2009 Stay Order");

WHEREAS there is an ongoing criminal grand jury investigation involving the products at issue in this case;

WHEREAS the parties have met and conferred and agreed to request modification and extension of the September 12, 2008, February 5, 2009, and June 8, 2009 Stay Orders;

PLAINTIFFS, DEFENDANTS, AND THE UNITED STATES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR UNDERSIGNED COUNSEL, HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

That Paragraph 3 of the September 12, 2008 Stay Order shall be modified and replaced in its entirety with the following new Paragraph 3:

During the pendency of the grand jury proceedings and any resulting criminal trials, no discovery shall be conducted in this case (including, without limitation, document requests, interrogatories, requests to admit, or depositions) that reflects, refers to, or relates to grand jury proceedings concerning CRTs or CRT products, including any party's or witness's communications with the United States, or with any grand jury investigating CRTs or CRT products, except by the order of the Court upon good cause shown and consistent with governing law.

That Paragraph 5 of the June 8, 2009 Stay Order shall be modified and that Paragraph 2(b) of the February 5, 2009 Stay Order shall be modified and replaced in its entirety with the following new Paragraph 2(b):

The Stay Period, as defined in paragraph 1 of the February 5, 2009 Stay Order, shall be extended until March 8, 2010. Moreover, no deposition discovery may be taken until November 1, 2010, with the following exception: Beginning on March 8, 2010, depositions may be taken of defendants' customers or suppliers, or their employees, provided in any case that the deponent is not a defendant or a subsidiary or affiliate of a defendant, or an employee, agent, or former employee of any of them. Such deposition subpoenas may include requests for documents to be produced by the deponent at the deposition, provided that no document requests may request the production of documents disclosing ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.