Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Johnson v. Yates

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 7, 2010

ARTHUR EUGENE JOHNSON, PETITIONER,
v.
JAMES A. YATES, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Pursuant to the order, filed on December 11, 2009, respondent filed supplemental briefing on December 22, 2009. Petitioner subsequently filed a notice regarding his apparent placement in administrative segregation which evidently has made accessing his legal property difficult. In the December 11, 2009, order, petitioner was permitted seven days from the filing of respondent's supplemental briefing to file a reply. The court will construe petitioner's notice as a request for an extension of time and will liberally grant petitioner 21 days from the date of this order to file any reply. The exigencies of the court's calendar precludes any further extension.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's December 28, 2009, notice, construed as a request for an extension of time (Docket No. 23) is granted; and

2. Petitioner is granted 21 days from the date of this order in which to file a reply to the supplemental briefing. There will be no further extension of time.

20100107

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.