Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Richerson v. Stanton

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 11, 2010

MICHAEL RICHERSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
GARY STANTON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

On July 29, 2009, plaintiff filed his consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned (docket #4). By order filed September 8, 2009, the court granted plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. In the September 8th order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaint. On October 1, 2009, plaintiff was granted a sixty (60) day extension of time to file his amended complaint. The sixty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

For the reasons given in the September 8, 2009, order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

20100111

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.