IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 11, 2010
MICHAEL RICHERSON, PLAINTIFF,
GARY STANTON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge
On July 29, 2009, plaintiff filed his consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned (docket #4). By order filed September 8, 2009, the court granted plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. In the September 8th order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaint. On October 1, 2009, plaintiff was granted a sixty (60) day extension of time to file his amended complaint. The sixty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.
For the reasons given in the September 8, 2009, order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.