Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bonner v. Cate

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION


January 11, 2010

WILLIAM B. BONNER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CATE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows U.S. Magistrate Judge

STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND STAYING LITIGATION PENDING SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATION

The parties stipulate to vacate all pending deadlines set in the scheduling orders of July 23 and December 3, 2009, and stay this action for 120 days to permit the parties to pursue a settlement.

The requested stay will allow time for Defendants to obtain settlement authority, and for the parties to attempt to negotiate a settlement or arrange for a settlement conference. If no settlement is reached at the end of 120 days, the parties will either seek additional time to reach a settlement, or request that the Court lift the stay and issue a new order rescheduling all pending deadlines. If the stay is lifted, the parties will proceed with litigation of this action.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

JOANNA R. MENDOZA Attorney for Plaintiff William Bonner

ANTHONY P. O'BRIEN Attorney for Defendants Sisto and Cate

ORDER

Having reviewed the stipulation of the parties, and good cause showing, the stipulation is the order of the Court. (signatures of counsel on original filing)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100111

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.