JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. Jan 11 2010
/ WITH COUNSEL Neha A. Mehta, DFPD
/ GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY
There being a finding/verdict of / GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of:
Theft of Government Property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641 as charged in the Single-Count Indictment.
The Court asked whether defendant had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of:
Probation for a term of three (3) years under the following terms and conditions: The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 318;
During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and restitution in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;
The defendant shall not be employed in any capacity wherein she has custody, control or management of her employer's funds, without notice to the employer of this conviction and approval of the probation officer;
The defendant shall not be employed by the United States Postal Service and/or any other competitive mail couriers to include Fedex, UPS, and DHL;
The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant; and
The defendant shall apply monies in excess of $500 received from income tax refunds to the outstanding court-ordered financial obligation. In addition, the defendant shall apply all monies received from lottery winnings, inheritance, judgments and any anticipated or unexpected financial gains to the outstanding court-ordered financial obligation.
The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.
The defendant shall comply with General Order No. 01-05.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100, ...